home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: "john (j.d.) hickin" <hickin@bnr.ca>
- Message-ID: <4i99r7$5mr@bmtlh10.bnr.ca>
- X-Original-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 1996 14:18:15 +0000
- Path: in1.uu.net!bounce-back
- Date: 14 Mar 96 16:46:10 GMT
- Approved: fjh@cs.mu.oz.au
- Subject: Re: Anyone considered inheritable friendship?
- Newsgroups: comp.std.c++
- Organization: Bell Northern Research
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 1.1 (X11; I; HP-UX A.09.05 9000/715)
- X-Url: news:4i7qjr$gr7@mujibur.inmind.com
- X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.std.c++
- iQBFAgUBMUhNeuEDnX0m9pzZAQFB5wF9GUxNAVIgQV3TKSGUGWMj2iKY8U1SVlMg
- K/iNZuLeg4JIKcncJAKcR/s1OFFSODzy
- =T6wo
-
- |> I suggested once that the keyword "friends" should indicate that
-
- class X {
- #ifdef X_FRIENDS
- X_FRIENDS;
- #endif
- public:
- ..
- };
-
- The above hack should let you develop a tightly-coupled hierarchy with
- minimal fuss until closure can be applied and the final friend declaration
- inserted in its place.
-
- In my opinion a tightly-coupled framework must be finite a-priori. I can't
- reconcile this requirement with that of inherited friendship.
-
- --
- John Hickin Nortel Technology, Montreal, Quebec
- (514) 765-7924 hickin@bnr.ca
- ---
- [ comp.std.c++ is moderated. To submit articles: try just posting with ]
- [ your news-reader. If that fails, use mailto:std-c++@ncar.ucar.edu ]
- [ FAQ: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/faq.html ]
- [ Policy: http://reality.sgi.com/employees/austern_mti/std-c++/policy.html ]
- [ Comments? mailto:std-c++-request@ncar.ucar.edu ]
-